**Linear polarization–direction correlations in gamma-ray scattering experiments.**

Scattering measurements with incident linearly polarized gamma rays provide information on spins, parities, and gamma-ray multipolarity mixing coefficients, and, therefore, on the nuclear matrix elements involved in the transitions. We present the general formalism for analyzing the observed angular correlations. The expressions are used to compute three-dimensional radiation patterns, which are important tools for optimizing experimental setups. Frequently, gamma-ray transitions can proceed via two multipolarities that mix coherently. In such cases, the relative phases of the nuclear matrix elements are important when comparing results from different measurements. We discuss different phase conventions that have been used in the literature and present their relationships. Finally, we propose a basic experimental geometry consisting of detectors located at four different spatial locations. For this geometry, we present the measured anisotropies of the emitted gamma rays in graphical format as an aid in the data analysis.

The figure shows examples for angular correlations when an unpolarized (two panels on the left) or linearly polarized (four panels on the right) gamma-ray beam is incident on zero-spin target nuclei. The beam moves along the positive z-direction. The target is located in the center of each pattern. Target nuclei absorb photons from the beam to form an excited level of given spin and parity. The excited level decays back to the target ground state by emission of gamma rays. The 3D patterns depict the spacial intensity pattern of the emitted gamma-rays, revealing distinct angular correlations. Notice that the shapes of the patterns depend on the spin-parity of the excited level and on the presence or absence of beam polarization in the experiment. For more information, see Iliadis and Friman-Gayer, Eur. Phys. J. A, 57, 190 (2021).

**Calculation of resonance energies from Q values.**

Resonance energies are frequently derived from precisely measured excitation energies and reaction Q values. The latter quantities are usually calculated from atomic instead of nuclear mass differences. This procedure disregards the energy shift caused by the difference in the total electron binding energies before and after the interaction. Assuming that the interacting nuclei in a stellar plasma are fully ionized, this energy shift can have a significant effect, considering that the resonance energy enters exponentially into the expression for the narrow- resonance thermonuclear reaction rates. As an example, the rate of the 36Ar(p,gamma)37K reaction is discussed, which, at temperatures below 1 GK, depends only on the contributions of a single resonance and direct capture. In this case, disregarding the energy shift caused by the total electron binding energy difference erroneously enhances the rate by about 40% near temperatures of 70 MK.

The figure shows the ratio of 36Ar(p,gamma)37K reaction rates obtained with nuclear masses and atomic masses for calculating the center-of-mass resonance energy. (Solid line) Rate ratio that takes all resonant and nonresonant contributions into account. (Dashed line) Rate ratio for the Ecm = 315 keV resonance alone, according to the expression R = exp(−0.0230/T9 ). For more information, see Iliadis, Phys. Rev. C 99, 065809 (2019).